down the cost. Director Sproule added that grantors want to give funding
for projects that are ready to go. President Kindelin said the restrictions
would be how much can you get for a historic restoration. She
recommended looking at energy efficiency federal grants and monetizing
tax credits. Director Sproule said staff are working to have an independent
financial consultant join the May meeting.
Trustee Wesley said he likes the work that was done but not the price tag.
These numbers are now in the same ballpark which makes it hard for him
to choose. President Kindelin said the conceptual recommended is
$39.2M. He inquired about the difference between that and the $57M
scheme. President Kindelin said the preferred scheme was pared down
even further. Instead of having three levels of functional space, the lobby will
be on the main level with no programming on the basement level. The next
stage will give the ability to answer the harder questions about value
engineering. The two things that drive a project are schedule and budget so
this building buys you time. She recommends making a 10-year master
plan.
It was moved by Trustee Wesley, seconded by Trustee Straw, to extend the
meeting past 10:00 P.M. A voice vote was taken and the motion was approved.
Trustee Wesley said he is not advocating tearing down this building. It is
about opportunity cost and what is the best value we can get for it. If we
build something new, we'd spend the same amount of money and gain a lot
more flexibility. He doesn't want to spend $112M on just a new Village Hall
and police station. He said he would like to explore the possibility of
integrated and commercial uses, like the Vantage building. Manager
Jackson said we would try to extend the lifecycle of this building another
70-80 years which is a big value. Technology will need to be upgraded and
that analysis will be concurrent with any option chosen.
Trustee Straw said the different price points reflect how we live into our
values differently. He said he liked Scheme 2B with the customer-facing
services in the addition. This isn't just feasible--it's more cost effective than
the previous Option 4. We are looking at a minimum of $30M to get this
Village Hall to where it needs to be to function into the future. He said thinks
we are going in the right direction and it allows us to take a phased
approach to have the least disruption to Village services. Director Sproule
said staff will compare the existing Option 4 to the options presented
tonight for the May meeting. Trustee Straw said he wants to highlight
accessibility, inclusivity, sustainability, and environmental impact in
whichever design is chosen.
Trustee Buchanan said she doesn't see how the Board can make a
decision about Village Hall without knowing what we are doing with the
police station. She said she does not like the architecture of this building
and referenced brutalist architecture designed by predominantly white men
as their artistic expression. She wondered how much they were