Title
title
A Resolution Approving the Continued Engagement of an Additional Law Firm for Legal Services to be Performed on Behalf of the Village of Oak Park
..end
Introduction
overview
Since 2012, it has been standard protocol for the Village Manager to bring engagements for contractual legal services to the Village Board for authorization from time to time.
end
body
Recommended Action
Adopt the Resolution.
Prior Board Action
The Board has previously approved similar items for FY 2026 (RES 25-216), FY 2025 (RES-24-349), FY 2024 (RES 24-106), FY 2023 (RES 22-297), FY 2022 (RES 21-322), FY 2021 (RES 21-52); FY 2020 (RES 20-017), FY 2019 (RES 19-53), FY 2018 (RES 18-756), FY 2017 (RES 17-463), FY 2016 (RES 16-100), FY 2015 (RES 15-215 & RES 15-125).
Background
Pursuant to Section 2-5-1 of the Oak Park Village Code, the Village Manager is authorized to employ legal counsel for the various needs of the Village. The Village Board is further authorized to approve the engagement of independent contractors for the purpose of handling specific legal matters per Section 2-6-1 of the Code. Earthjustice is a nonprofit law organization the Village is interested in engaging for legal services.
On July 30, the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled in the Village’s favor regarding the Village’s all-electric building ordinance. On August 19, the Clean Energy Choice Coalition, who filed the original suit, filed a notice of appeal.
Timing Considerations
It is recommended that the Village Board approve the Resolution at its August 25 Board meeting.
Budget Impact
There is no anticipated budget impact to this item.
Staffing Impact
Engagement of the new firm will reduce in-house and retained attorney time and expenses.
DEI Impact
There is no DEI impact associated with this item.
Community Input
There has been no community input given in relation to this item.
Staff Recommendation
Adopt the Resolution
Advantages:
• This action will result in a reduction in attorney time and expenses.
• Engagement of attorneys with subject-matter expertise.
Disadvantages:
• There are no disadvantages to this action.
Alternatives
Alternative 1:
The Board could choose not to adopt the Resolution.
Advantages:
• There are no advantages to this alternative.
Disadvantages:
• This action will result in increased attorney time and expenses.
Anticipated Future Actions
There are no anticipated future actions in relation to this item.
Prepared By: Jack Malec, Assistant to the Village Manager
Reviewed By: Brooke Lenneman, Interim Village Attorney
Approved By: Kevin J. Jackson, Village Manager
Attachment(s):
1. Resolution
2. Addendum