motion to explore the opportunity to create a revenue stream by sharing the
proceeds from the parking lot more equitable between the Village and the
operator. Trustee Wesley seconded. Attorney Stephanides noted the
operator would have to voluntarily enter into an agreement like that.
President Scaman asked if it is possible to delay the time the charging
starts. Partner Camillucci said there is a 30-minute period where there
would be no charge even if you do not get your parking validated. President
Scaman asked if there are particular businesses complaining about
parking. Partner Camillucci said the fast casual restaurants expressed
concerns. President Scaman said she is generally in favor though she sees
equity concerns with phone requirements and she does not think this will
change behavior or solve the problem.
Trustee Buchanan requested an understanding of the new process. Partner
Camillucci said a picture of the license plate gets timestamped upon entry.
The customer will be able to validate their parking session at each retailer
by scanning a QR code or texting your license plate number. If you are not a
customer and do not get validation, when you exit the lot, you will have to
pay the amount due via website or app or phone. If you do not pay, an
invoice will be mailed.
Trustee Robinson said she is supportive and it is important that the
signage be clear and visible. She questioned why the zoning code is being
amended for principal usage when this is an accessory usage. Village
Planner Craig Failor explained it is accessory today because it is only
there for the operation of the businesses.
Trustee Straw asked what the impact will be down the line if someone else
wants to develop a surface lot purely for profit. Planner Failor said it is a
special use so they would have to go through a public hearing process.
Trustee Straw asked if it changes the standard by which the Village
reviews an application if it requires a text amendment. Attorney
Stephanides said it does not. Trustee Straw said he is not excited about
surface lot as a primary use and thinks it is a poor precedent to set. He
said he is probably a no vote. He recommended additional signage
between the lot and Maple Avenue.
Trustee Straw inquired what the citation fee amount would be. Partner
Camillucci said the invoice is the amount of the parking fee. SP+
Corporation Regional Manager Ivan Matic said they recommend the
industry standard of $50, which would go to the operator and the owner. If
they were not aware they were in violation, they would be able to send an
email and request to waive the fee, especially if it is their first violation.
Trustee Straw said he is a strong no and this structure seems almost as
predatory as towing. He asked if the mailing envelopes would look like
parking tickets, which Manager Matic said they would not.